ToolTip PluginAdvertisers

Interview on CBS "Face the Nation"

Start Date: Saturday, April 7, 2001

Last Modified: Monday, May 4, 2020

End Date: Friday, December 31, 9999

Interview on CBS "Face the Nation"

Secretary Colin L. Powell
Interview on CBS "Face the Nation" by Bob Schieffer of CBS and Tom Friedman of The New York Times
Washington, DC
April 8, 2001

MR. SCHIEFFER: Today on Face the Nation, Secretary of State Colin Powell on the China standoff. The Chinese are still insisting that the United States apologize for last week's collision between a navy surveillance plane and a Chinese jet fighter. What will the Administration do? Are the crew members hostages? We'll ask Secretary of State Powell

Then we'll get Congress's view of all this from two members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Senators Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana, and Chris Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut.

But first, Secretary of State Powell on Face the Nation. And with us now in the studio, Secretary of State Colin Powell. Mr. Secretary, thank you for joining us.

SECRETARY POWELL: Good to be here, Tom.

MR. SCHIEFFER: Also here, Tom Friedman of the New York Times, sitting in for Gloria Borger.

Mr. Secretary, first, what is the latest?

SECRETARY POWELL: The latest is that we are in intense negotiations with Chinese officials in Beijing. Our ambassador, Ambassador Joe Prueher, has been in twice so far this morning to exchange ideas, to exchange documents, to find a way through this difficult situation we find ourselves in.

There is a road map that we set out with the Chinese leadership a few days ago. The President put it down and said here's a way that we can get out of this, and we are on that road map. I wish we were moving a little faster, but things are on track. And I'm hoping we can continue to see progress over the next few days.

MR. SCHIEFFER: Obviously, the Secretary of State does not go on national television in the midst of something like this unless he has a message for all sides concerned. What is your message today to the Chinese Government?

SECRETARY POWELL: My message to the Chinese Government is that this incident should be brought to a conclusion as quickly as possible. If there are factual disagreements and if there are issues that we want to raise subsequently, let's do it in a forum that has been set up for such purposes in the maritime agreement that has been mentioned on a number of occasions in the Press, or through some other forum. Let's not keep these 24 young men and women detained in China while the two governments are having a political dispute. Let's get this behind us as quickly as possible.

The other message I would give to the Chinese Government is that serious damage is now starting to be done to the relationship. Congressional delegations are canceling their trips to China. I'm getting calls from business leader saying, "Not sure I'm going to go visit."

And so damage is being done. And we want to limit that damage and get back on a positive track because we have many things we need to be doing together. And we don�t want to see this relationship damaged in the time of opportunity.

MR. FRIEDMAN: Mr. Secretary, Ambassador Prueher has had a chance to talk to the crew now. Can you tell us what actually happened? Our plane is going along slowly, this plane comes from under, from above. What happened here?

SECRETARY POWELL: I really don't want to give that kind of information because, first of all, I don't have it all and I'm not sure we should be describing all of the details of the accident officially until we've had a chance to really debrief our crews and find out what they say to us, not in the setting of a Chinese officers club.

MR. FRIEDMAN: The Chinese say we run into them.

SECRETARY POWELL: I have seen no evidence whatsoever, nor have I heard of any evidence, that suggest that our plane took any action which precipitated this accident, this incident. So that is our position right now, which is why it is impossible for us to say we're responsible, and thereby it is not proper for us to extent an apology. We have nothing to apologize for at this moment.

MR. SCHIEFFER: Mr. Secretary, how did the plane get from where it was when the accident occurred to this Chinese base? Was it guided there? What happened?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, as near as I can tell, it was a remarkable feat of airmanship on the part of the crew. When they realized how seriously damaged the airplane was, they knew they had to put it on the ground.

I'm not a pilot, but I know from pilots that I've talked to, you get the plane on the ground. And that was the closest airfield that they could get to. And so they started down after losing control for about 8,000 feet. The pilot recovered and was flying this crippled airplane toward that airfield.

He went on a guard frequency, an international guard frequency, broadcast maydays and tried to get clearance. But for one reason or another -- and I don't know the answer to this, following observation or question -- he didn't get that clearance from that airfield.

And so he nevertheless went in with the other Chinese plane, as I understand it, with him as they went in. and he landed the plane safely. And he should get enormous credit. The crew should get enormous credit for having done that.

MR. SCHIEFFER: Well, was the Chinese Government surprised when that plane sat down?

SECRETARY POWELL: I'm sure they were. I mean, suddenly a crippled plane shows up that was not expected. I'm sure it was a surprise, although perhaps the Chinese pilot, the other Chinese pilot, called ahead. I don't know that. I'm speculating.

Sure they were surprised, but I think a quick examination of what was there, a damaged airplane that had to be landed and some young men and women who were not threatening anybody. They just happened to be there, should have told the Chinese rather quickly that an accident has happened, that we just need to get to the bottom of. But it really doesn't seem to be to have led to a course of action which would have suggested that they should have detained them for this length of time.

MR. FRIEDMAN: Mr. Secretary, be a little more specific on what is at stake here for the Chinese. Are there actually businessmen telling you, "We're ready to reduce our investments"?

SECRETARY POWELL: I'm getting calls from Members of Congress, and I've met with Members of Congress. They're canceling their delegation trips. They're also saying, "You know, Secretary Powell, you'll have a much more difficult time with, say, getting another permanent normal trading relations bill through if you don't get World Trade Organization accession this year."

And I'm getting calls from very senior former officials who travel regularly to China and businesspeople who travel to China to do deals, and they're saying, "you know, it's becoming difficult to justify us going there at this time." The relationship is being damaged and the sooner we can bring this to a conclusion, we can halt the damage, not let things get any worse, and get back to broader equities that we should be talking to the Chinese about.

MR. FRIEDMAN: Mr. Secretary, there was a sense, I would say about 24 to 36 hours ago, that this was now heading for some kind of resolution. I sense it's stuck somewhere now. Where exactly is it stuck?

SECRETARY POWELL: The road map that was described 24, 36, 72 hours ago, we're still on that road map. There are some zigs and zags on it, and there are still some exchanges of views that would suggest we're at loggerheads, but we're on that road map and it is unfolding.

MR. FRIEDMAN: We are on the road but we are at loggerheads at this moment?

SECRETARY POWELL: There are occasional loggerheads, little barriers you have to get around but I am confident we will be able to get around these barriers. How quickly, I don�t know. I would have preferred to have this resolved a week ago, but for reasons that are within the Chinese Government�s framework to understand, it didn�t happen. They had to go through a process within their government and we are watching it unfold.

MR. FRIEDMAN: Are you worried that the Weekly Standard, a pro-Republican journal here in Washington, widely read, has referred to President Bush's behavior in this as a "national humiliation"?

SECRETARY POWELL: That is very unfortunate, and it is also absurd. The President has been leading since day one. He spoke firmly the first day or two, and we didn't know anything about our crew. We didn't know whether they were safe. We had no access to them, and he made the appropriate demands. I tried to engage the Chinese Government at the highest levels. It was clear they wanted to handle it within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Every step of the way for the last seven days, President Bush and I think the rest, supported by the national security team, has acted in a responsible way that recognizes that there is a large relationship here that we have to worry about, but we also have 24 young Americans we have to get out as soon as possible. He has been sensitive to the families. He has been sensitive to the strategic issues that we have on the table.

And he has been sensitive, frankly, to the feelings of the Chinese, and I don't find anything wrong with this. They are the only ones who have lost somebody at this point, and there is a widow out there and we regret that. We're sorry that her husband was lost, no matter what the fault was.

And I think President Bush has handled this in a very, very positive way, showing leadership all the way, and frankly, trusting and relying on his national security team to execute his decisions.

MR. FRIEDMAN: Would you rule out military action at some point?

SECRETARY POWELL: I don't see any -- there's no need to speculate for this. I don't know where military action even enters this equation at this point.

MR. SCHIEFFER: Mr. Secretary, you have said that the Chinese know that they should not expect an apology. Let me just ask you and obvious question. What would be wrong with apologizing?

SECRETARY POWELL: Because, when you apologize, you're suggesting you did something wrong; you're accepting responsibility for something that you don't believe you have responsibility for. And so it would be very inappropriate for us to have their government, which is detaining 24 of our youngsters, to place a demand on us and we accept their version of events when we have reason to believe that that version is not the correct version.

And we have a way of finding out the correct version through established channels that have been created in formal documents. So there's a way to get to the truth, and until we get to the truth, it would be very inappropriate for us to accept responsibility and to offer an apology.

What we have done, and what President Bush has done and what I have done and what Ambassador Prueher is talking to them about, is to make sure that they understand we do regret the loss of their pilot and plane. We do acknowledge that we violated their air space, but look at the emergency circumstances that the pilot was facing. And we regret that, we're expressed sorrow for it, and we're sorry that that happened, but that can't be seen as an apology accepting responsibility.

MR. SCHIEFFER: The Chinese are also saying that we should stop these flights. Is there any possibility that that could happen?

SECRETARY POWELL: Our reconnaissance flights have been going on for decades. They go on over international waters in international air space. They threaten no one. They're part of our national security efforts to keep peace in the world and to make sure that we are safe and secure and our allies are safe and secure. And we can't stop performing those flights just because one country or another prefers that we not fly them.

So our reconnaissance flights -- when we fly them, how we will fly them in international air space over international water -- will be something that the United States Government will decide.

MR. SCHIEFFER: Let me ask you just this question. You've talked about how this relationship has been damaged already. Give me some specifics on that. Is that in trade, China's membership in the World Trade Organization? Where do you see that damage is really being done?

SECRETARY POWELL: I am hearing from Members of Congress. I briefed a number of them last week. They've gone off on recess, so they won't be here this week. But I can say to you right now that if they were in session this coming week, and when they do come back, if this has not been resolved -- I'm not suggesting it won't be -- there will be action. There will be a great sense of outrage that this is continuing and a great sense of outrage and concern that how could we have stable relations with a country that is acting in this way.

And so this is the time for the Chinese leadership to bring this matter to a conclusion as rapidly as possible. And if there continue to be political disagreements between the two governments, let's not let those political disagreements serve as a reason for keeping these young men and women away from their families.

MR. FRIEDMAN: Mr. Secretary, we're now considering the sale of an advanced weapons system to Taiwan. Is this conflict right now, this tension, affecting the environment in which that decision will be made? Is that something you're communicating to the Chinese at all, or should they understand it?

SECRETARY POWELL: The Taiwan arms sales stands alone and apart, and we do that with respect to Taiwan's defensive needs. But I have to say that of course it's affecting the environment that we will be facing when we take the sale up on Capitol Hill if there is a perception that China is not acting in a reasonable and reasonable manner.

So even though we're keeping it separate, I can't help but say to the Chinese that it could become linked in the overall political climate that may exist at the time this goes up. And so it is not in anyone's interest; it's not in the United States' interest; it's not in the interest of China for this situation to continue very much longer.

MR. FRIEDMAN: Can I ask where our allies are? Feel like we're watching two guys bump into each other on the street and everyone's watching around and they're kind of headed for the hills. Where are they?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, there's no question that I have not seen a single country say that China is the person acting responsibly in this regard. Some have been more outgoing than others. The British have come forward and spoken out rather clearly.

A number of others have spoken to the Chinese quietly through their own channels in their own ways. And with every foreign visitor I have received in the past week, I have encouraged them to advise the Chinese Government in a similar fashion.

MR. SCHIEFFER: The President is planning to visit China, as I understand. Is that planning still under way for that?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, the President will be attending the summit meeting in Shanghai. That is the plan. And in response to an invitation from the Vice Premier when he was here and from the President of China, he was planning to visit China.

But, you know, the whole environment is at some risk right now. Fragility has been introduced into the relationship, and I can't tell what the likely consequences will be if this is not brought to a speedy conclusion.

MR. SCHIEFFER: Mr. Secretary, we'll end on that note. Thank you very much. And good luck, of course, in resolving this.

SECRETARY POWELL: Thank you very much.

[end]



Released on April 10, 2001
.

Colin Powell

Interview on CBS "Face the Nation" by Bob Schieffer of CBS and Tom Friedman of The New York Times

Interview on CBS "Face the Nation"

04/08/01

Roles:

Everyone: All Users
Secretary RemarksNavigation Secretary RemarksModule Interview on CBS "Face the Nation"Generic Enhanced DD
       <b>CROSSWALKS (This Advertisement shows 08 Related Records (From All Modules) - vertical column right (of record view)</b> (The Logic is Filtering by Region, Subject, Program and Glossary)Advertisers
#Set Active Nav - Content TypesAdvertisers
Form JS: Remove max-width on form elements & Autocomplete Off Date PickersAdvertisers
<b>Yellow Highlighting of Module Details View: Keyword Searched Value<b>Advertisers
U.S. State Department Design (CSS and related styles records)Styles ChinaAudience Advertisers Sponsored Keywords Splash Pages
visual editor / client console / x close editor
Module Designer
Children of this Page
Taxonomy
Dynamic Scripts
Advertising
Site Design & Layout