9 FAM 502.2
Family-Based IV Classifications
(CT:VISA-893; 07-15-2019)
(Office of Origin: CA/VO/L/R)
9 FAM 502.2-1 Family-based iv
classifications overview
9 FAM 502.2-1(A) Related
Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
9 FAM 502.2-1(A)(1) Immigration
and Nationality Act
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
INA 101(b) (8 U.S.C. 1101(b)); INA 101(a)(35) (8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(35).
9 FAM 502.2-1(A)(2) Code of
Federal Regulations
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
22 CFR 42.31; 8 CFR 204.2(a).
9 FAM 502.2-1(B) Family
Classifications Overview
(CT:VISA-581; 05-03-2018)
Two groups of family-based immigrant visa categories are
provided under provisions of United States immigration law: Immediate Relative
(IR) and Family Preference. Immediate Relative (IR) immigrant visas are based
on a close family relationship with a U.S. citizen. The number of immigrants
in these categories is not limited each fiscal year (see 9 FAM 502.2-2).
Family Preference immigrant visas are for specific, more distant, family
relationships with a U.S. citizen and some specified relationships with a
Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR). There are fiscal year numerical limitations
on family preference immigrants (see 9 FAM 502.2-3).
There are also special immigration benefits for certain Amerasian children (see
9 FAM
502.2-4).
9 FAM 502.2-1(C) Conferring
Immigration Benefits to Family Members
(CT:VISA-385; 06-15-2017)
a. Immigration Benefits from Adult
Children Only: Only U.S. citizens aged at least 21 years may confer
immigration benefits on a parent or parents.
b. Parents or Siblings of Adopted
Child:
(1) Biological Parents or Siblings:
An adopted child (as defined in INA 101(b)(1)(E), (F) or (G)) may not confer immigration
benefits upon a natural parent or sibling unless such adoption has been legally
terminated. This is true even where the child never received an immigration
benefit based on the adoption.
(2) When Adoption Has Been
Terminated: A natural parent or child or sibling relationship can be
recognized for immigration purposes following the termination of an adoption,
if the petitioner can demonstrate that:
(a) No immigration benefit was obtained or conferred as
a result of the adoptive relationship on the adoptive parent(s);
(b) A natural parent or child relationship meeting the
requirements of INA 101(b) once existed;
(c) Any adoption that satisfied the requirements of INA
101(b)(1)(E) has been lawfully terminated; and
(d) The petitioner's natural relationship with the
beneficiary has been reestablished, either through operation of law or through
other legal process.
c. Immigration Benefit Conferred from
Child to Father: USCIS has determined that an illegitimate child may
confer immigration benefits to a father if:
(1) The father has established that he is the natural
parent; and
(2) A bona fide parent or child relationship has been
in existence prior to the childs 21st birthday. (See 9 FAM
102.8-2(D) definition of child born out of wedlock.)
9 FAM 502.2-1(D) Proxy
Marriages
(CT:VISA-191; 09-28-2016)
a. Consummated Proxy Marriage:
If the consular officer is satisfied that the marriage has been consummated, he
or she may proceed with processing the visa application based on the premise
that a consummated proxy marriage relates back to the date of the proxy
ceremony.
b. Unconsummated Proxy Marriage:
If the marriage has not been consummated, the consular officer must return the
petition to DHS. (See 9 FAM 504.2-8.)
If the marriage is subsequently consummated, and DHS approves a petition for
the same preference classification, the new petition approval can be regarded
as a reaffirmation of the validity of the original petition and the original
priority date is retained.
9 FAM 502.2-1(E) Forced Marriages
(CT:VISA-824; 06-03-2019)
a. If the petitioner or beneficiary indicates to the
consular officer that they are being forced to marry against their will, the
officer should 221g the case and enter detailed case notes regarding the forced
marriage circumstances so that another officer does not issue the visa. The
officer should then reach out to their VO/F post liaison for guidance. The
Visa Office works closely with USCIS on cases involving allegations of forced
marriage, and can provide case by case guidance to post while working to
protect the confidentiality of the party that disclosed the forced marriage.
b. In instances where the adjudicating officer has
reason to believe the applicant is being forced to marry against their will,
post should conduct a more in-depth interview with the applicant, preferably in
a privacy window. Officers should obtain a statement from the applicant
detailing the circumstances of the marriage and his/her intention and
willingness to enter into the marriage.
c. If a forced marriage case results in a consular
return, and if the applicant or beneficiary inquires, Post is advised only to
communicate that the petition has been returned to USCIS.
9 fam 502.2-2 immediate relative
(IR) Classifications
9 FAM 502.2-2(A) Related
Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
9 FAM 502.2-2(A)(1) Immigration
and Nationality Act
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
INA 101(b)(1)(E)-(G) (8 U.S.C. 1101(b)(1)(E)-(G)); INA
101(c)(1) (8 U.S.C. 1101(c)(1)); INA 201(b) (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)); INA 203(a)(1)
(8 U.S.C. 1153(a)(1)); INA 203(d) (8 U.S.C. 1153(d)); INA 216 (8 U.S.C. 1186a).
9 FAM 502.2-2(A)(2) Code of
Federal Regulations
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
8 CFR 204.2(a)-(b); 8 CFR 204.2(d); 8 CFR 204.2(f); 22 CFR
42.21(a); 22 CFR 42.41.
9 FAM 502.2-2(A)(3) Public
Law
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments Act of 1986, Public
Law 99-639, sec. 2; Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act of
1994, Public Law 103-416, sec. 219(b)(1); Violent Crime Control and Law
Enforcement Act of 1994, Public Law 103-322, sec. 40701; Immigration Act of
1990, Public Law 101-649, sec. 101(a).
9 FAM 502.2-2(B) Immediate
Relative Defined
(CT:VISA-893; 07-15-2019)
a. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) defines
immediate relative to include the following:
(1) Spouse of a U.S. citizen (see Marriage in 9 FAM 102.8-1
Definitions);
(2) Certain spouses (and the accompanying or
following-to-join children) of deceased U.S. citizens (see Widow in 9 FAM
502.1-2(C) Definitions);
(3) Child of a U.S. citizen (see Child in 9 FAM
102.8-2(A) Definitions);
(4) Adopted child of a U.S. citizen (see Adopted
child in 9
FAM 102.8-2(G) (Definitions) and 9 FAM
502.3-2(B) (Adoption-Based Classification));
(5) Orphan adopted or to be adopted by a U.S. citizen
residing in the United States (see Orphan in 9 FAM
102.8-2(H) (Definitions) and 9 FAM 502.3-3
(Adoption-Based Classification));
(6) Parent of an adult U.S. citizen (see Parent in 9 FAM
102.8-2(J) Definitions); and
(7) Child under 16 adopted or to be adopted under the
terms of the Hague Convention (see Convention adoptee in 9 FAM
102.8-2(I) (Definitions) and 9 FAM
502.3-4(B) and 9 FAM
502.3-4(C)(1), Convention Adoptee Classification Summary)).
b. See 9 FAM 102.8 for definitions of
family-based relationship terms.
c. An alien is entitled to status as an Immediate
Relative if you have received a properly approved petition from the Department
of Homeland Security and you are satisfied that the claimed relationship
exists.
d. Derivative Immediate Relative
Status for Spouses or Children:
(1) The INA does not generally accord derivative
status for family members of immediate relatives as it does for preference
applicants. (INA 203(d) does not apply to the classes described in INA
201(b)). A U.S. citizen must file separate immediate relative petitions for
the spouse, each child, and each parent.
(2) Parents of U.S. citizens are accorded immediate
relative (IR5) status only upon U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
approval of a Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative, establishing that the
appropriate child-parent relationship exists. In certain circumstances, a U.S.
citizen may be entitled to petition for only one parent, such as when the
beneficiarys spouse does not meet the definition of parent as set forth at
INA 101(b)(2). For example, an alien who becomes a stepparent of an 18 year old
is not considered to be the parent of that child for immigration purposes
(see INA 101(b)(1)(B)). Consequently, should that stepchild become a U.S.
citizen, USCIS would be unable to approve a Form I-130, Petition for Alien
Relative (for IR5 status) for that stepparent. Further, spouses and children
of IR5s cannot benefit from derivative status through the principal alien.
Spouses who cannot qualify in their own right for IR-5 status, and any children
of an IR5, would require the filing of a separate Form I-130 petition (family-based
second preference classification) upon the principals admission to the United
States as a permanent resident.
(3) Section 219(b)(1) of Public Law 103-416 makes an
exception to the general rule by providing derivative status for the accompanying
or following-to-join children of spouses of deceased U.S. citizens.
e. Spouse and Child of Deceased U.S.
Citizen Defined:
(1) INA 201(b)(2)(A)(i) defines
immediate relatives to include the spouse of a deceased U.S. citizen,
provided the spouse:
(a) Was not legally
separated at the time of the spouses death;
(b) Has not
remarried; and
(c) Files a
petition under INA 204(a)(1)(A)(ii) within two years after the death of the
spouse.
(2) An immediate
relative also includes the child(ren) of the spouse of the deceased U.S.
citizen. Such children, however, may not petition in their own behalf, but are
derivatives of the principal beneficiary. Consequently, they can obtain status
only as derivatives by accompanying or following to join the principal beneficiary.
Derivative status does not extend to unmarried sons or daughters of widows or
widowers. See 9 FAM
502.1-1(D)(8) for additional
information on the effects of September 11, 2001 terrorist act-inspired
legislation on immediate relative classification and petition procedures.
9 FAM 502.2-2(C) Immediate
Relative Classification Special Cases
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
a. Refusal to File Immediate Relative
(IR) Petition:
(1) In general, the spouse, child, or parent of a U.S.
citizen who is entitled to classification as an immediate relative (IR) should
be processed as an IR. However, if you are fully satisfied that the U.S.
citizen relative has refused to file a petition on behalf of the spouse, child,
or parent, for reasons other than financial consideration or inconvenience, you
may consider the applicant for any other type of immigrant visa for which he or
she is qualified.
(2) If an alien is classifiable both as an IR and a
preference immigrant, and the aliens spouse refuses to file an IR petition to
avoid conditional status, you may process the alien case as that of a
preference immigrant. (See 9 FAM
502.2-2(D).)
(3) Abusers generally refuse to file relative
petitions because they find it easier to control relatives who do not have
lawful immigration status. Section 40701 of Public Law 103-322 contains
provisions that allow the qualified spouse or child of an abusive U.S. citizen
or LPR to self-petition for immigrant classification.
b. Alien Classifiable as Immediate
Relative (IR) and Special Immigrant: An alien classifiable as an
immediate relative who is also classifiable as a special immigrant under INA
101(a)(27)(A) or INA 101(a)(27)(B) may establish entitlement to classification
under either category, depending upon which of the two may be more easily
established. Since special immigrants under INA 101(a)(27)(A) and (B) are not
subject to numerical limitations, this procedure is in accord with the original
intent of Congress in enacting INA 201(b), namely, to prevent the use of
immigrant visa numbers by aliens who are able to immigrate in a visa category
not subject to numerical limitations.
c. Immediate Relative Classification
Following Petitioners Naturalization in Family Second Preference Petition
Cases: See 9 FAM
502.1-2(D) for additional information on conversion of F2 petition to
accord IR status.
d. Petition Procedures: See
also 9 FAM
504.2-3 for information on petition procedures for U.S. citizens abroad.
9 FAM 502.2-2(D) Conditional
Status for Certain Immediate Relatives
(CT:VISA-873; 06-26-2019)
a. The Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments Act of
1986 (Public Law 99-639) amended the Immigration and Nationality Act by adding
section 216 (8 U.S.C. 1186a) which provides conditional permanent resident
status for certain immediate relative categories at the time of admission.
b. You classify the spouse of a U.S. citizen or the
stepchild of a U.S. citizen as a conditional immigrant at the time of visa
issuance if the basis for immigration is a marriage that was entered into less
than two years prior to the date of visa issuance. (See also 9 FAM
504.10-3.)
9 FAM 502.2-3 Family Preference
Classifications
9 FAM 502.2-3(A) Related
Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
9 FAM 502.2-3(A)(1) Immigration
and Nationality Act
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
INA 101(a)(27)(A) (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(A)); INA 203(a) (8
U.S.C. 1153(a)).
9 FAM 502.2-3(A)(2) Code of
Federal Regulations
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
22 CFR 42.31.
9 FAM 502.2-3(A)(3) Public
Law
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
Child Status Protection Act, Public Law 107-208.
9 FAM 502.2-3(B) Entitlement to
Family Preference IV Classification
(CT:VISA-556; 04-02-2018)
a. A U.S. citizen or a permanent resident alien may
file an immigrant visa petition under INA 203(a) on behalf of a family member
if the alien meets one of the relationship categories listed below:
(1) First Preference:
Unmarried sons and daughters of U.S. citizens;
(2) Second Preference:
Spouses and unmarried sons and daughters of lawful permanent resident aliens:
(a) F2A: Spouse and children of
legal permanent resident. "F2A" is the term used in the monthly Visa
Bulletin. The terms used in the chart at 9 FAM 502.1-3 are "F21" (spouse) and
"F22" (child). These latter terms are printed on the issued
immigrant visa.
(b) F2B: Unmarried sons and
daughters (over 21) of legal permanent residents. (Also referred to as
"F24" for IV issuance purposes.) A minor child of a principal alien
in the F2B category is an F25.
(c) FX: Although there is a
per-country limit of 7 percent of the total number of preference immigrant
visas, the INA allows for a certain percentage of the F2A numbers to be exempt
from the per-country limit; they are issued using the FX issuance symbol. Post
may issue to otherwise qualified FX cases without concern for this cap, which
is managed by the Visa Office.
(3) Third Preference: Married
sons and daughters of U.S. citizens; and
(4) Fourth Preference:
Brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens.
b. The alien must be the beneficiary of a Department of
Homeland Security-approved petition and must meet all other requirements for
the issuance of an immigrant visa.
c. See 9 FAM 102.8
for Definitions or descriptions of relationship terms. For application of the
Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) to family preference cases, see 9 FAM
502.1-1(D).
9 FAM 502.2-3(C) Derivative
Status for Spouse and Children (Family Preference Classification)
(CT:VISA-191; 09-28-2016)
a. The spouse and unmarried children of an alien
beneficiary are entitled to the same preference status, and the same priority
date, as the principal alien.
b. Offspring of Derivative Child:
(1) A derivative beneficiary of an approved immigrant
visa petition cannot bestow upon someone else the immigration status they,
themselves, have derived from the principal beneficiary.
(2) For example, if an LPR files a second preference
petition for his wife, she is the principal beneficiary of the status accorded
by the petition. Any children (as defined by INA 101(b)(1)) of the principal
beneficiary (the wife) would derive from their mother the same immigration
status that she has been granted. However, the law does not provide an avenue
for derivative beneficiaries to pass their derived immigration status on to any
children of their own (or to anyone else for that matter).
(3) Under such circumstances, however, the petitioner
could elect to file a separate petition for any of his children who have
children of their own. With a separately approved petition, the petitioner's
child would then become the principal beneficiary of the petition and,
accordingly, the child's children would qualify for derivative immigration
status through the principal beneficiary parent.
c. Filing Petitions for Derivative
Aliens: Careful attention should be paid to cases where a derivative
beneficiary's immigration status is likely to change.
(1) For instance, when a child turns 21, he or she is
no longer considered a "child" under the INA. The Child Status
Protection Act (CSPA) may protect the derivative from aging out and losing
the ability to derive status from the principal beneficiary of the petition.
(See 9
FAM 502.1-1(D) for guidance on CSPA calculations.)
(2) Likewise, if the petitioner intends to become a
U.S. citizen before his wife and children have immigrated to the United States,
he should file separate immigrant visa petitions for any children who are
currently deriving their immigration status through the mother. That way, when
the petitioner is naturalized, the petition according second preference status
(F21) to his wife, as well as those petitions according second preference status
(F22) to any children, will be converted automatically to accord the
beneficiaries immediate relative status (IR1 or IR2). If, however, the
petitioner does not file separate petitions for his children before his
naturalization, the children will lose their derivative status upon the
father's naturalization, since the mother's status will automatically convert
to IR1 and there is no derivative status for immediate relatives. The father
will then have to file new petitions on their behalf to accord them IR2 status.
d. Filing Separate Petitions for F2
Derivatives: Although the spouse or child of an LPR is entitled to
derivative status, a recession of the cut-off date in the derivative category
resulting in the unavailability of a number in the derivative category might
encourage the filing of a second preference petition. However, there is
normally a substantial amount of time involved before the petition could be
approved, and the second preference might also be delayed. The decision to
file or not to file a second preference petition must be the petitioners.
Consular officers must neither encourage nor discourage the filing of a second
preference petition but may provide copies of recent Visa Office bulletins,
which indicate the movement of priority dates. In unusual circumstances, it is
possible that slow movement in the beneficiarys derivative class might
indicate that the filing of a second preference petition may be beneficial.
9 FAM 502.2-3(D) Automatic
Conversion of Petitions (Family Preference Classifications)
(CT:VISA-385; 06-15-2017)
a. Immediate Relative Converts to
First or Third Preference: If the child of a U.S. citizen is the
beneficiary of an immediate relative petition, the petition automatically
converts to a first preference petition if the child reaches the age of 21 and
remains unmarried (see also 9 FAM
502.1-1(D) for details on the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA)). If the
child should marry, the immediate relative petition converts to third
preference petition. The priority date of the first preference petition is the
filing date of the immediate relative petition.
b. First Preference Converts to Third
Preference: If the unmarried son or daughter of a U.S. citizen marries
before the visa is issued, the beneficiary's first preference petition
automatically converts to a family third preference petition. Any child(ren)
of the beneficiary would then be entitled to derivative third preference
status. The priority remains the same.
c. Second Preference Converts to
Immediate Relative: A second preference petition for the spouse of a
lawful permanent resident (LPR) automatically converts to an immediate relative
petition if the petitioner becomes a U.S. citizen. However, derivative second
preference status for the beneficiary's child(ren) does not convert, since
there is no derivative status for immediate relative petitions. The petitioner
must file a separate petition for the child, if the child meets the definition
of "child" as defined in 9 FAM
102.8-2(A). The priority remains the same.
d. Second Preference Converts to First
Preference: A second preference petition for the unmarried son or
daughter of a lawful permanent resident automatically converts to a first
preference petition if the petitioner becomes a U.S. citizen (see also 9 FAM
502.1-1(D) for details on the CSPA). The accompanying or following-to-join
child(ren) would also be entitled to derivative first preference status. The
priority remains the same.
e. Third Preference Converts to First
Preference:
(1) A third preference petition approved for a married
son or daughter of a U.S. citizen who has since become widowed or divorced
automatically converts to accord first preference status (or immediate relative
status if the beneficiary is under the age of 21). If the petition converts to
first preference, the accompanying or following-to-join child(ren) may be
granted derivative first preference status. The priority remains the same.
(2) There is no derivative status for the child(ren),
if the beneficiary becomes entitled to immediate relative status.
9 FAM 502.2-3(E) Second
Preference Petitioner Residing Abroad (Family Preference Classifications)
(CT:VISA-385; 06-15-2017)
a. Second Preference Petition Filed
Abroad by Returning Resident Alien: An alien who qualifies as a special
immigrant returning resident under the terms of INA 101(a)(27)(A) is by
definition an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence. The alien may
be considered to have the same status under the identical language of INA 203(a)(2).
Therefore, an alien issued a special immigrant visa as a returning permanent
resident, an alien returning with a valid reentry permit, or an alien holding a
Form I-551, Permanent Resident Card, may file a petition while abroad for a
spouse or an unmarried son or daughter.
b. When Legal Permanent Resident (LPR)
Status is Doubtful:
(1) INA 101(a)(20) reads as follows: The term
lawfully admitted for permanent residence means the status of having been
lawfully accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as
an immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws, such status not having
changed.
(2) If a consular officer has reason to believe the
petitioner may no longer be entitled to permanent resident status, the consular
officer must return the petition to the appropriate DHS office pursuant to 22
CFR 42.43(a). If the petitioner has filed a petition abroad, the consular
officer should forward the petition for DHS adjudication as a case "not
clearly approvable." (See 9 FAM 504.2-8.)
9 FAM 502.2-3(F) Related Family
Preference Classification Provisions
(CT:VISA-385; 06-15-2017)
a. See 9 FAM
503.3-3(A) related to new petition approval being equivalent to
revalidation if filed by same petitioner on behalf of same beneficiary.
b. See 9 FAM
504.10-2(E)(2) related to statement signed by alien issued visa as
unmarried son or daughter.
c. See 9 FAM 102.8-1
definition of marriage regarding family-sponsored preference petitions in
cases of marriage between relatives.
d. See 9 FAM 504.2-3(B)
related to special petition procedures for U.S. citizens and resident aliens
abroad.
e. Spouse, Child, Son, or Daughter of
LPR Killed in September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks: The spouse, child,
son, or daughter of an alien killed in a September 11, 2001 terrorist attack,
may self-petition for status using the Form I-130, Petition for Alien
Relative. They will be processed as if the petitioner had not been killed in
the attack. The beneficiary must demonstrate that he or she was present in the
United States on September 11, 2001, that the spouse or parent had lawful
permanent resident (LPR) status on September 11, 2001, and that the spouse or
parent was killed as a direct result of the terrorist attacks.
9 FAM 502.2-4 AMERASIAN
FAMILY-BASED CLASSIFICATION
9 FAM 502.2-4(A) Related
Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
9 FAM 502.2-4(A)(1) Immigration
and Nationality Act
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
INA 204(f) (8 U.S.C. 1154(f)).
9 FAM 502.2-4(A)(2) Code of
Federal Regulations
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
8 CFR 204.4; 8 CFR 205.1(a)(3)(ii).
9 FAM 502.2-4(A)(3) Public
Laws
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
Public Law 97-359; Public Law 100-202, sec. 584; Foreign
Operations, and Export Financing and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1990,
Public Law 101-167, Title II; Foreign Operations, and Export Financing and
Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1991, Public Law 101-513, Title II;
Immigration Act of 1990 ,Public Law 101-649, sec. 603(a)(20)).
9 FAM 502.2-4(B) Amerasian
Classification under INA 204(f)(1)
(CT:VISA-556; 04-02-2018)
a. The Amerasian Immigration Act (AIA), Public Law
97-359 of October 22, 1982, added section 204(g) (now INA 204(f)(2)) to the INA
to provide preferential treatment in the immigration of certain illegitimate
Amerasian children of U.S. citizen fathers who are unable to immigrate under
any other section of the INA. Prior to enactment of Public Law 97-359, these
children were unable to gain any benefits from their relationship to their
father. The provisions of INA 204(f)(1) enable them to do so without requiring
their father to file a petition on their behalf.
b. To qualify for benefits under INA 204(f)(1) the
beneficiary must have been:
(1) Born in Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, or
Thailand after December 31, 1950, and before October 22, 1982; and
(2) Fathered by a U.S. citizen.
c. Beneficiaries under age 21 and unmarried are
entitled to classification as immediate relatives; unmarried sons and daughters
over the age of 21 to classification as family first preference; and married
sons and daughters to family third preference.
d. Petition Procedures for Amerasian
Child:
(1) Any alien claiming to be eligible for benefits as
an Amerasian under INA 204(f)(1), or any person on the aliens behalf, may file
a petition, Form I-360, Petition for Amerasian, Widow, or Special Immigrant
with DHS.
(2) You may not approve petitions for Amerasian
children who are beneficiaries under this section, unlike for Amerasian
children who qualify under the Amerasian Homecoming Act described in 9 FAM 502.2-4(C) below. See 8 CFR 204.4 for information on DHS
processing and screening of Amerasian children cases under this section.
(3) Similar to other IV applications, the approval of
an I-360 petition under INA 204 is
considered to establish prima facie entitlement to status. The validity of the
relationship between the U.S. citizen father and the alien beneficiary is
presumed to exist. A qualified principal applicant is issued AM-1, a
spouse or child AM-2, and an AM-3 to the natural mother of an AM-3. You must
stipulate in the case notes whether you are issuing an IV on the basis of the
Amerasian Immigration Act (this section) or the Amerasian Homecoming Act (see 9 FAM
502.2-4(C) below).
(4) Revocation of Petition for
Amerasian Child: DHS regulations for the revocation of petitions for
Amerasian beneficiaries under this section are provided in 8 CFR 205.1(a)(ii).
9 FAM 502.2-4(C) Amerasian
Classification for Vietnamese Children Under the Amerasian Homecoming Act
(CT:VISA-556; 04-02-2018)
a. Introduction: Congress
passed the Amerasian Homecoming Act (AHA), Public Law 100-202, in 1988 to
facilitate the immigration of this specific group to the United States. An
additional 55,312 immigrant visas were issued to derivative family members of
those applicants.
b. Who Qualifies: The 1988
Amerasian Homecoming Act (AHA) is for individuals fathered by an American
citizen and born in Vietnam between January 1, 1962 and January 1, 1976. A
qualified principal applicant is issued AM-1, a spouse or child AM-2, and an
AM-3 to the natural mother of an AM-1. You must stipulate in the case notes
whether you are issuing an IV on the basis of the Amerasian Homecoming Act
(this section) or the Amerasian Immigration Act (see 9 FAM
502.2-4(B) above).
c. Case Processing: Individuals
can apply for an AM-1 visa at a consular section without an approved petition.
The applicant should provide:
(1) Copies of evidence showing that the applicant was
born in Vietnam between January 1, 1962 and January 1, 1976.
(2) Copies of evidence establishing the parentage of
the applicant and the U.S. citizen biological father (birth certificates,
baptismal records, correspondence, financial support from the father, etc.).
(3) If the applicant is married, a copy of the
marriage certificate and proof of the termination of any prior marriage.
d. As with other IV cases, those requiring further
evidence should be refused under INA 221(g). These cases will
also undergo the same termination processing as other IV classifications.
9 FAM 502.2-4(D) Alternative
Amerasian Classification
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
An Amerasian child may immigrate under another provision
of the INA, if so qualified. For example, an alien may be classified as an
orphan under INA 101(b)(1)(F) (see 9 FAM
502.2-4(C)).