9 FAM 403.10
(U) NIV Refusals
(CT:VISA-913; 08-06-2019)
(Office of Origin: CA/VO/L/R)
9 fAM 403.10-1 (U) Statutory and
REgulatory Authorities
9 FAM 403.10-1(A) (U)
Immigration and Nationality Act
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
(U) INA 214(b) (8 U.S.C. 1184(b));
INA 221(g) (8 U.S.C. 1201(g)).
9 FAM 403.10-1(B) (U) Code of
Federal Regulations
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
(U) 22 CFR 41.121.
9 FAM 403.10-2 (U) In General
(CT:VISA-276; 01-05-2017)
(U) The determination of a
nonimmigrant applicant's classification and eligibility to receive a visa is
your statutory responsibility and may not be delegated to any other officer
(except as provided in 22 CFR 41.111(b)) or to a member of the clerical staff.
9 FAM 403.10-2(A) (U) Visa to
be Issued or Refused
(CT:VISA-380; 06-12-2017)
a. (U) A nonimmigrant visa
(NIV) must be issued or refused in all cases once an application is executed,
except when the Secretary has ordered you to discontinue issuing visas under
INA 243(d). See 9 FAM 403.2-3 for the definition of "making a visa
application." The visa refusals must be based on legal grounds; that is,
on the provisions of INA 212(a), INA 212(e), INA 212(f), INA 214(b), INA 214(l), INA 221(g), INA 222(g), or some
other specific legal provision. A quasi-refusal (e.g., P6C, P6E, etc.) may not
be used as the sole ground for a refusal. See 9 FAM 302
for grounds of ineligibility. See 9 FAM 601.12 for a discussion of INA 243(d).
b. (U) You should only make a
formal finding of ineligibility in the context of a visa application or
revocation of an existing visa. A hard refusal code entry should only be
placed in the Consular Lookout and Support System (CLASS) if you are denying or
revoking a visa.
9 FAM 403.10-2(B) (U) Grounds
for Refusal
9 FAM 403.10-2(B)(1) (U)
Applying Grounds for Refusals and Ineligibilities
(CT:VISA-913; 08-06-2019)
a. (U) Establishing Eligibility for
Nonimmigrant Status:
(1) (U) INA 214(b) provides
that every visa applicant is presumed to be an immigrant until the applicant
establishes to the satisfaction of the consular officer eligibility for a
nonimmigrant status under INA 101(a)(15). Consular
officers must make a finding that an applicant does or does not meet the
eligibility requirements for the classification sought and is therefore not a
nonimmigrant under INA 101(a)(15). This determination cannot be waived.
(2) (U) However, INA 214(b) is
not a permanent ineligibility. The fact that a visa applicant was unable to
establish qualification for a nonimmigrant status at one time does not preclude
such an applicant from subsequently qualifying for a visa by showing a change
in circumstances.
(3) (U) For more information
on applying INA 214(b) see 9 FAM 302.1-2,
Presumption of Immigrant Status- INA 214(b).
b. (U) Grounds of Ineligibility:
(1) (U) Grounds of Ineligibility Not
Applicable to Nonimmigrants: Certain grounds of ineligibility do not
apply to some nonimmigrants. For example, some nonimmigrants are exempt from
the provisions of INA 212(a)(3)(D) (membership in a totalitarian party), INA
212(a)(5)(A) (labor certification requirements), INA 212(a)(5)(B) (unqualified
physicians), INA 212(a)(5)(C) (uncertified health care workers), INA
212(a)(8)(A) (ineligible for citizenship),
and INA 212(a)(10)(A) (practicing
polygamists).
(2) (U) Grounds of Ineligibility Not
Applicable to A and G Applicants: INA 102 provides broad exemptions from
grounds of inadmissibility for A and G applicants, except domestics and
personal employees. Upon a basis of reciprocity, INA 212(d)(8) also provides
broad exemptions for foreign government officials in transit. These are not in
the nature of waivers or other discretionary acts; they provide statutory
immunity from ineligibility under the special provisions. INA 212(d)(8) does
not provide exemption for INA 212(a)(3)(A), INA(a)(3)(B),
INA(a)(3)(C), or INA(a) (7)(B).
(3) (U) Recommending Waivers: For
aliens found ineligible under non‑exempted provisions of INA 212(a), you
have discretionary authority under INA 212(d)(3)(A) to recommend to the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) a waiver of the specific ground of
ineligibility.
c. (U) Failure
to Appear, Withdrawal, or Abandonment:
(1) (U) Applicant
Who Fails to Appear for Interview at Post:
(a) (U) No Show Cases: If an
applicant has failed to make a visa application as delineated in 9 FAM 403.2-3,
enter as a case remark: "No Show case: Application was never made per 9 FAM 403.2-3"
and delete the case from the NIV system. The case must not be refused.
Deleted cases will no longer be available in posts database, but they may be
found in the CCD using the Deleted NIV Applicant Full report under the Nonimmigrant Visa tab in the CCD menu.
(b) (U) Executed Application Cases: If
an applicant who is not eligible for interview waiver fails to appear for an
interview but has met the requirements for making an application per 9 FAM 403.2-3,
refuse the case under INA 221(g) with case
notes explaining that the applicant met the requirements for making an
application but failed to appear for an interview.
(2) (U) Applicants
Refused If Application Withdrawn: If an applicant withdraws a visa
application while it is pending adjudication, you must refuse the case under
INA 221(g) with case notes indicating why the action was taken. The case must
not be deleted.
(3) (U) Applicants
Refused If Visa Abandoned: If the case has been adjudicated (print
authorized), but not printed, and the applicant subsequently abandons the
application, deciding not to travel, you must refuse the case under INA 221(g)
with case notes indicating why the action was taken. The case must not be
deleted.
(4) (U) Reactivating Cases: Please
see 9
FAM 403.10-4(A) for information on reactivating cases refused under INA
221(g).
9 FAM 403.10-2(B)(2) (U)
Refusals of Out-of-District Applicants
(CT:VISA-562; 04-04-2018)
a. (U) 221(g)
Refusals: You must adjudicate all applications based upon the
applicant's circumstances rather than refusing them under INA 221(g) solely because the applicants are
out-of-district. Refusing an applicant simply because the applicant is out of
district is a missed opportunity and a waste of post's and the applicant's
time.
b. (U) 214(b)
Refusals of Out-of-District Applicants:
(1) (U) Refusing an applicant
under INA 214(b) solely for
out-of-district reasons is not appropriate. Section 214(b) requires that the
applicant demonstrate both entitlement for a specific visa classification and
absence of immigrant intent (see 9 FAM
401.1-3(E)). Consular officers can still determine
whether the alien qualifies for a particular visa class, and whether there is
immigrant intent on the part an out-of-district applicant.
(2) (U) Certainly, an
out-of-district applicant may alert you to possible fraud or, at the least,
forum shopping. In addition, it may be more difficult for an out-of-district
applicant to overcome the burden of proof. However, you should not refuse an
applicant solely because he or she is applying outside of the consular district
where he or she typically resides.
(3) (U) In addition, most NIV
applicants must establish that they have a residence abroad that they do not
intend to abandon. That residence need not be in the country where they are
applying. It is incorrect to refuse an out-of-district applicant solely
because his or her ties are to a different country abroad. However, if the
applicant is applying for a visa category that requires that he or she demonstrate
a residence abroad that he or she does not intend to abandon, and the applicant
is unable to do so, you should refuse the case under 214(b) because the
applicant has not demonstrated that he or she qualifies for the visa for which
he or she applied.
(4) (U) Some nationalities are
residents of countries where no U.S. consular services are available and have
specific posts designated for their applications with appropriate
language-trained officers. When officers are concerned about document, language
and translation barriers, posts should let the public and prospective
applicants know that lack of a common language could negatively affect an
application. Posts may want to use this language on their websites:
"Applicants from outside this office's consular district may apply for
visas. However, you should be aware that language difficulties and
interviewing officers' unfamiliarity with local conditions in other countries
may make it more difficult to demonstrate your qualifications for a visa here
than in your home district or at a post designated for your application."
9 FAM 403.10-3 (U) Refusal
Procedures
9 FAM 403.10-3(A) (U) Refusal
Cases
(CT:VISA-913; 08-06-2019)
(U) When an alien is found
ineligible to receive a visa, you must take the steps listed in notes 9 FAM
403.10-3(A)(1) through
9 FAM 403.10-3(C) below.
9 FAM 403.10-3(A)(1) (U)
Inform Alien Orally and Return Certain Documents
(CT:VISA-562; 04-04-2018)
a. Unavailable
b. (U) You must return to the
applicant all documents not pertinent to the refusal or indicative of possible
ineligibility. Letters and other documents addressed to an officer or the post
should be retained and either filed or destroyed.
c. (U) The manner in which
visa applicants are refused can be very important in relations between the post
and the host country, as well as to the United States image to the applicant
and the broader population. You should be courteous at all times and must be
careful not to appear insensitive.
d. (U) Explanations of why a
visa could not be issued need not be lengthy. You should explain the law
and the refusal politely and in clear terms, providing a citation of the legal
section relied upon. Use of jargon or obscure terms can create confusion,
frustration and, often, additional work in the form of congressional and public
inquiries. An example: In a case involving a refusal under INA 214(b) for
insufficient ties, it is essential that you tell the applicant that the reason
for the refusal is that he or she has not persuaded you that he or she will
return to his or her country. Fitting a certain demographic profile
("young", "single", etc.) is not grounds for a visa
refusal. In a 214(b) refusal, the denial must always be based on a finding
that the applicants specific circumstances failed to overcome the intending
immigrant presumption. Written 214(b) and 221(g) refusal letters are more than
mere formalities; they can be an effective method of conveying information to
the applicant.
e. (U) You must not encourage
or discourage the visa applicant to reapply, even if you believe that eventual
issuance of a visa is likely or unlikely. You should make clear to applicants
that they may reapply if they believe they genuinely qualify since there is no
formal appeal of an NIV refusal. Efforts to control reapplications must not
unduly restrict applicants' ability to reapply, although they may be warned
that applicants who have not yet had the opportunity to apply may be scheduled
before they are rescheduled.
f. (U) Exceptions to Notice
Requirement: INA 212(b), which
requires you to provide the applicant with a timely written notice in most
cases involving a 212(a) refusal, also provides for a waiver of this
requirement. However, only the Department may grant a waiver of the written
notice requirement. Furthermore, although 212(b) also exempts findings of
ineligibility under INA 212(a)(2) and (3)
from the written notice requirement, we expect that such notices will be
provided to the alien in all 212(a)(2) and (3) cases unless:
(1) (U) We
instruct you not to provide notice;
(2) (U) We instruct you to
provide a limited legal citation (i.e., restricting the legal grounds of
refusal to 212(a)); or
(3) (U) In
response to a request, you receive permission from us not to provide notice.
9 FAM 403.10-3(A)(2) (U)
Inform Applicant and Attorney in Writing
(CT:VISA-562; 04-04-2018)
(U) In any NIV case involving a
refusal under any provision of the law, you must provide the applicant and any
attorney of record a written refusal.
(1) (U) 214(b)
Refusal Letter: In the case of an
NIV refusal based on 214(b), posts are required to provide applicants with the
Department-approved letter appropriate for the applicants circumstances. The
prescribed refusal letters are found at 9 FAM
403.10-3(A)(3) below. 9 FAM
403.10-3(A)(3) paragraph a below contains the refusal letter appropriate
for those applicants being denied for lack of a residence abroad. 9 FAM
403.10-3(A)(3) paragraph b below contains the refusal letter appropriate
for those visa classes subject to 214(b), but not the residence abroad
requirement.
(2) (U) 221(g)
Refusal Letter: For an INA 221(g)
NIV refusal, posts may draft the refusal letter in the manner they deem
appropriate and without Department approval. However, the letter must:
(a) (U) Explicitly state the
provision of the law under which the visa is refused;
(b) (U) Not state that the
denial is pending, temporary, or interim or that the case is suspended,
although it may reference further administrative processing of the case;
(c) (U) Neither encourage nor
discourage the applicant from reapplying; and
(d) (U) Include the following
language:
Please be advised that for U.S. visa purposes,
including ESTA (see ESTA website), this decision constitutes a denial of a visa.
(3) (U) 212(a)
NIV refusals: Posts may draft the refusal letter in the manner they
deem appropriate and without Department approval. However, the letter must:
(a) (U) Explicitly state the
provision of the law under which the visa is refused, unless instructed or
authorized to do otherwise by the Department;
(b) (U) Neither encourage nor
discourage the applicant from reapplying; and
(c) (U) Inform the applicant
whether a waiver is available.
(4) (U) Alternatively, for INA
221(g) and INA 212(a) refusals, posts may elect to use the optional refusal
letter found at 9 FAM
403.10-3(A)(3) paragraph c below, or they may choose to modify the letter
as necessary. If posts use a modified version, the letter must meet the
criteria listed above.
9 FAM 403.10-3(A)(3) (U)
Refusal Letters in 214(b), 221(g) and Other Cases
(CT:VISA-434; 08-11-2017)
a. (U) Refusal Letter for Denials Under INA
214(b) for Applicants Who
Fail to Establish Ties:
You may use the Failure to Establish Ties Letter to inform an applicant of the refusal under INA
214(b). A sample of the Failure to
Establish Ties Letter is provided is
provided below.
Dear Applicant:
This is to inform you that you have been found
ineligible for a nonimmigrant visa under Section 214(b) of the U.S. Immigration
and Nationality Act. A denial under Section 214(b) means that you were
not able to demonstrate that your intended activities in the United States
would be consistent with the classification of the nonimmigrant visa for which
you applied.
While nonimmigrant visa classifications each have
their own unique requirements, one requirement shared by many of the
nonimmigrant visa categories is for the applicant to demonstrate that he/she
has a residence in a foreign country which he/she has no intention of abandoning.
Applicants usually meet this requirement by demonstrating that they have strong
ties overseas that indicate that they will return to a foreign country after a
temporary visit to the United States. Such ties include professional, work,
school, family, or social links to a foreign country. You have not
demonstrated that you have the ties that will compel you to return to your home
country after your travel to the United States.
Todays decision cannot be appealed. However,
you may reapply at any time. If you decide to reapply, you must submit a
new application form and photo, pay the visa application fee again, and make a
new appointment to be interviewed by a consular officer. If you choose to
reapply, you should be prepared to provide information that was not presented
in your original application, or to demonstrate that your circumstances have
changed since that application.
Sincerely,
Consular Officer
b. (U) Refusal Letter for Denials Under INA
214(b) for Applicants Who
Fail to Qualify For Reasons Other Than Failure to Show Ties: You
may use the Other INA
214(b) Refusal Reasons Letter
for an applicant who you are denying under INA 214(b) for reasons other than failure to show ties.
The following is a sample of the Other INA 214(b) Refusal Reasons Letter:
Dear Applicant:
This is to inform you that you have been found
ineligible for a nonimmigrant visa under Section 214(b) of the U.S. Immigration
and Nationality Act. A denial under Section 214(b) means that you did not
meet the requirements of the classification of the nonimmigrant visa for which
you applied.
Todays decision cannot be appealed. However,
you may reapply at any time. If you decide to reapply, you must submit a
new application form and photo, pay the visa application fee again, as
applicable, and be interviewed by a consular officer. If you choose to
reapply, you should be prepared to provide information that was not presented
in your original application, or to demonstrate that your circumstances have
changed since that application.
Sincerely,
Consular Officer
c. (U) Optional Refusal Letter: You may use the Optional Refusal Letter to inform an applicant of the refusal. The
following is sample text of the Optional Refusal Letter:
This office regrets to inform you that your visa
application is refused because you have been found ineligible to receive a visa
under the following section(s) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The
information contained in the paragraphs marked with "X" pertains to
your visa application. Please disregard the unmarked paragraphs.
__ Section 212(a)(1) health-related grounds.
__ Section 212(a)(4) which prohibits the issuance of
a visa to anyone likely to become a public charge.
__ Section 212(a)(2) which prohibits the issuance of
a visa to anyone who has committed a crime involving moral turpitude.
__Other____________________________________________________________
Waiver
__You are eligible to seek a waiver of the grounds
of ineligibility.
__ No waiver is available for the grounds of
ineligibility.
9 FAM 403.10-3(A)(4) (U)
Enter Refusal Data into NIV System
(CT:VISA-562; 04-04-2018)
a. Unavailable
(1) Unavailable
(2) Unavailable
b. Unavailable
c. Unavailable
d. (U) Remarks attached to a
case reside in the CCD and are accessible to posts worldwide, as well as to
certain partner agencies, such as CBP at POE. Your notes must be written in a
professional manner that can be clearly understood and that are legally
valid. Avoid using post-specific notations, non-English words, non-standard
abbreviations, and making irrelevant remarks. If the refusal seems
counterintuitive, you should comment on the factors that led to the refusal.
9 FAM 403.10-3(A)(5) (U) Explore
Possibility of Relief
(CT:VISA-380; 06-12-2017)
(U) Waivers are not available for
INA 214(b) ineligibilities, but the applicant is free to re-apply for a visa.
INA 221(g) refusals require the applicant to wait for the results of additional
administrative processing or comply with a request for additional documentation
or information within one year of the visa interview. If the case involves a
Category I refusal, you must explain whether or not administrative relief (a
waiver or other means, such as parole) is available. 9 FAM
303.3-3(B)(1) contains a list of lookout codes and states whether the codes
are Category I or Category II.
9 FAM 403.10-3(A)(6) (U)
Additional Procedure When Refusing Applicants Who Possess a Valid Form I-94,
Arrival and Departure Record
(CT:VISA-562; 04-04-2018)
a. (U) In addition to
recording the refusal electronically, officers, especially officers at posts in
Canada and Mexico, should take additional
steps in certain cases involving aliens who might seek to take advantage of the
automatic visa revalidation provisions of 22 CFR 41.112(d) but who are not
eligible to do so due to their unsuccessful visa application.
b. Unavailable
(1) Unavailable
(2) Unavailable
9 FAM 403.10-3(A)(7) (U)
Indicating Nonimmigrant Visa Refusals in Passports
(CT:VISA-562; 04-04-2018)
(U) Do not place a stamp
indicating application received, or any other marking in an applicants
passport in connection with a visa application. With issuance and refusal data
now available to all posts through the Consular Consolidated Database (CCD),
there is no longer a need to alert interviewing officers to previous refusals
by marking an applicants passport. In addition, CCD information is now
available at secondary in ports of entries (POEs) and at other DHS offices.
Officers at posts in Canada and Mexico should ensure they follow the procedures
in 9
FAM 403.10-3(A)(6) above for refusing
applicants who may have been eligible for automatic visa revalidation at POEs.
9 FAM 403.10-3(B) (U)
Procedures in Cases Refused for Advisory Opinions or for Other Reasons
(CT:VISA-434; 08-11-2017)
a. (U) Advisory
Opinion Requested:
(1) (U) If the Departments
opinion has been requested, a visa may not be issued until the opinion has been
officially rendered and communicated to the requesting post.
(2) Unavailable
(3) (U) The post should use a
tickler system as a reminder to send the Department a follow-up request for a
response after a reasonable period of time has elapsed. If you determine on
the basis of the Departments advisory opinion that the alien is ineligible
under a provision of INA 212(a), 212(e), 214(b), or some other specific legal
provision, you must formally refuse the alien under the pertinent section of
the law. Under no circumstances may a final resolution of the question of
eligibility be made before the Departments advisory opinion is received. (See
9 FAM
403.10-3(C) below and 9 FAM
403.10-3(B) paragraph a(1), above.)
b. (U) Other
Reasons: You should also refuse the visa under INA 221(g) and make
clear case notes in other situations where the alien has formally applied, but
a final determination of admissibility is deferred for additional evidence,
further clearance, a namecheck, or some other reason.
9 FAM 403.10-3(C) (U)
Quasi-Refusal Cases
(CT:VISA-562; 04-04-2018)
a. (U) Applicants in
quasi-refusal cases should be dealt with as described in 9 FAM
403.10-3(A)(1) and 9 FAM
403.10-3(A)(2) above.
b. (U) A quasi-refusal, by
definition, is not a refusal. It is not a determination of eligibility. You
cannot conclude a case by entering a quasi-refusal; you must enter a hard
refusal or issue the visa. You may not deny or revoke a visa based solely on
quasi-ineligibility. If an alien applies for a visa, the aliens eligibility
must be definitively resolved.
c. (U) If you obtain
derogatory information outside the context of an application or revocation, you
should enter the aliens name in the CLASS lookout system under the appropriate
P (quasi-refusal) code corresponding to the suspected or presumed
inadmissibility. The aliens eligibility should then be resolved if and when
the alien applies for a visa.
d. (U) You May
Enter a Quasi-Refusal in Only Two General Cases:
(1) (U) If you obtain
derogatory information outside the context of an application or revocation (see
9 FAM
403.11-4(B)(1)); or
(2) Unavailable
e. (U) Officers must enter a
hard refusal code (i.e., not a "P" hit) to ensure posts workload
statistics are accurately calculated.
f. Unavailable
g. (U) On occasion, an alien
may learn informally of a possible ineligibility. If, after being informed of
the apparent ineligibility, the alien decides not to make a formal application,
then that particular situation does not constitute a formal refusal, and it
must not be reported as such by the post. A quasi-refusal entry, however, may
be appropriate. If so, the post must enter the name of the alien into the
Consular Lookout and Support System (CLASS) as indicated in 9 FAM 303.3.
9 FAM 403.10-4 (U) Overcoming or
Waiving Refusals
(CT:VISA-562; 04-04-2018)
(U) INA 291 places the burden of
proof upon the applicant to establish eligibility to receive a visa. However,
the applicant is entitled to present evidence to overcome a presumption or
finding of ineligibility. It is the policy of the U.S. Government to give the
applicant every reasonable opportunity to establish eligibility to receive a
visa. This policy is the basis for the review of refusals at consular offices
and by the Department. It is in keeping with the spirit of American justice
and fairness. With regard to cases involving classified information, the
cooperation accorded the applicant must, of course, be consistent with security
considerations, within the reasonable, non-arbitrary, exercise of discretion in
the subjective judgments required under INA 214(b) and 221(g).
9 FAM 403.10-4(A) (U)
Reapplication Procedures
(CT:VISA-380; 06-12-2017)
a. (U) Previously refused visa
applicants may reapply any time, using the same procedures as first-time
applicants. See 9 FAM
403.2-6(A) for more information on
managing applications from previously refused applicants.
b. (U) Reactivation
of Case Refused Under INA 221(g): An applicant
who has been refused under INA 221(g) need not complete a new NIV application
form, or pay the machine readable visa (MRV) fee again, if less than one year
has elapsed since the latest refusal. When the requested information is submitted
by the applicant or the necessary clearances received, you should retrieve the
original Form DS-160 from posts files, note the new information or results of
the clearance process, and issue or refuse the visa. If one year or more has
elapsed since the latest refusal, the applicant must submit a new Form DS-160
and pay the MRV fee again in order for the case to proceed. If the cause of
the delay leading to the 221(g) refusal is a lack of U.S. Government action, or
U.S. Government error, the period of reapplication is extended indefinitely.
Hence, the MRV fee is not charged again when the application is pursued.
9 FAM 403.10-4(B) (U)
Overcoming Post Refusals
(CT:VISA-609; 06-25-2018)
a. (U) You should find that an
applicant has overcome a nonimmigrant visa (NIV) refusal under INA 221(g) in
two instances: when the applicant has presented additional evidence that allows
you to re-open and re-adjudicate the case, or when the administrative
processing on a case is completed. An NIV applicant missing a Form I-20 when
applying for an F-1 visa, for instance, should be refused INA 221(g) pending
presentation of that certificate (see 9 FAM
403.10-3(A) for guidance on INA 221g refusals). When the applicant returns
with the document, you should overcome the previous refusal, allowing the case
to be adjudicated.
b. (U) Similarly, if an
applicant refused under INA 212(a)(4), subsequently presents sufficient
evidence to overcome the public charge inadmissibility, you should process the
case to completion.
c. Unavailable
d. (U) In general, you should
not find that an applicant has overcome a refusal under INA 214(b) in the same
application. Most INA 214(b) cases are refused because the applicant has not
convinced the officer of his or her intent to return abroad after his or her
stay in the United States, as required under INA 101(a)(15)(B) (see 9 FAM
402.2-2(C) and 9 FAM
302.1-2(B)). As such, the only way to reassess the applicant's eligibility
would be for the applicant to reapply. In this situation, you should create a
new case in the system.
e. (U) However, Overcome/Waive
(O/W) may be appropriate for INA 214(b) cases when a supervisor believes the
INA 214(b) refusal was in error; for example, if you did not believe the
applicant fit the standards of the particular NIV classification for which he
or she had applied (see 9 FAM
302.1-2(B)(1)). If a supervisor overcomes such a case he or she should
discuss it with the refusing officer and take personal responsibility for the
case. See 9
FAM 403.12-2 for adjudication review
procedures.
9 FAM 403.10-4(C) Waiving a
Nonimmigrant Visa Inadmissibility
(CT:VISA-1; 11-18-2015)
(U) There is no waiver available
for refusals under INA 214(b) and INA 221(g). DHS has the authority to waive
most IV and NIV ineligibilities. INA 212(d)(3)(A) waivers in NIV cases require
an initial waiver recommendation from you or the Department. (See 9 FAM 305
for IV and NIV waivers.)